Saturday, February 23, 2013
Good Girl Refusing To Go Bad
Posted by miss royal at 11:25 AM 0 comments
Labels: accountability, fear(less), hope, love, peace
Saturday, December 24, 2011
He Is... The Resolution
I am so far removed.
That realization sometimes makes me feel damned to Hell.
Like I have no hope, no chance at being whom God wants me to be.
Sometimes my mind gets the best of me & I'm convinced that maybe I'm not chosen.
That I'm no child of God because there's this hole in my heart that God has yet to be able to fill.
I have desires that God's love just doesn't seem to satisfy.
And sometimes my way seems best, feels best.
I enjoy it.
At times, unapologetically.
On this day I just want to thank God for
His mercy, His grace, His love, His forgiveness.
All of which I abuse.
Take for granted even.
I am a mess. And yet I know He loves me.
I can't imagine loving like that.
I would love to, but I'm not sure any (wo)man could.
God, I'm grateful for the birth and physical death of Jesus.
For the Spirit that pricks my heart, and therefore reassures me that I'm not all bad.
God, as the new year approaches, it is my prayer that I find more pleasure in You,
that I am more pleasing to You
for no other reason than to truly show & prove to You that
I love You.
That's the least I can do.
#HopeandaFuture
Posted by miss royal at 6:55 PM 0 comments
Labels: accountability, God, hope, peace, self-discovery
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Straight. No Chaser, Please.
Posted by miss royal at 3:07 AM 0 comments
Labels: accountability, culture, intimacy, love, self-discovery
Monday, May 9, 2011
The Myth of the Stolen Man/Woman
"S/he stole my man/woman."
The thinking that a wo/man can steal your man/woman is ludicrous to me. Unless kidnapped or, maybe, blackmailed, no wo/man has that much power to make a man/woman leave you. Being that's usually not the case, it's fair to say your man/woman walked away. Without coercion.
Accept that truth & stop trying to blame a third party for the actions of "your man/woman". Your man/woman, although yours, can't be controlled, caged, tucked away safely like your other possessions. Like you, your man/woman have this power to make choices--to change their minds & therefore ... their hearts. [Ouch.] With that said, a man/woman can't be stolen, but they can choose to walk away. No matter the reason for doing so--another wo/man, and no matter the circumstances--s/he knew your man/woman had a lady/wife/man/husband--it was your man/woman's choice to leave you.
You'd think this would not have to be said, but with Mashonda's "woe-is-me-Alicia-Keys-stole my man" sob story being brought back to a dismal life on Vh1's "Love & Hip Hop" and the many statistics regarding relationships being "threatened" by social networks, I just felt a need to make this public service announcement of sorts. ...The way wo/men screen their partner's twitter Timelines, Facebook Recent Activity, Wall posts, Inbox, their cellphone history is quite ridiculous. Sad. And I hate to say it, but pitiful. As if them doing ANY of that stuff is going to keep their man/woman from walking away. All that energy is 1. a poor use of energy, 2. a sign of insecurity--either in yourself and/or your relationship; deal with it head on, not by playing Inspector Gadget or thinking you are powerful enough to manipulate "your" man/woman to stay, and 3. plain ol' foolish. Stop it! ...Your maturity is showing--it's quite little--and, more important, you're doing more harm to yourself (and probably the relationship you're trying so hard to hold onto) than not.
A little insecurity is natural from time-to-time (and, some would say, healthy), but the above actions and thinking is not healthy. Or rational. I mean, do we really believe that adult men & women are being stolen from us? Stolen? Ok, not him/her, but their heart, you say? ...My answer, a man/woman has to let their guard down, put themselves in a vulnerable position in order for their heart to be penetrated in a way of which your love could be replaced, no longer a desire to withhold and for another woman/man's to take shelter in their heart. Again, that's a choice. Your man/woman's choice.
Unfortunate, but true.
Posted by miss royal at 3:20 AM 0 comments
Labels: accountability, constructive criticism, insecurity, Just a Thought
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Untitled (Expectations, Disappointments & ...Self-Accountability)

Have you ever grown interested in someone and find yourself disappointed because things aren't going as you expected? Well, I know I have.
Relationships are so complex. Which is why I understand why people tend to keep their guard up--because to not have it up leaves them susceptible to becoming too comfortable with people who may not be here tomorrow. Unfortunately, by nature we are very penetrable. It is easy for us to receive information at face value (especially when there are tender eyes and a lovely smile attached to it)--"Ok, if s/he does that it means this"--in a 1 + 2 = 3 formula. But what many of us find is that such trust in others' actions may lead to disappointment because we find that things aren't always as they seem. ...Or, more likely, we find that our expectations aren't met.
And I guess that's what it boils down to--expectations. It is so easy to expect certain things when we naturally expect 1 + 2 to equal 3... as nature has proven. Too bad relationships, a thing of nature, are more complex than any mathematical problem you can think of. There is no formula. Just hope and discernment. We all are microcosms of complexity and no two people are the same and therefore no two circumstances are the same. And although there is plenty of wisdom to be found regarding relationships, there is no guarantee that when applied you will get the same result (answer) as the person from whom you received the advice (formula) as they did when they applied it to someone completely different than who you wish to apply the wisdom. *whew* And, for argument's sake, if you do apply the wisdom to the same person as the wise advisor, there is no guarantee that the person whom the wisdom is being applied to will react to it the same way when you do apply it. You get my drift? Relationships are complex! But, it is possible to eliminate some complexities.
Now, let's talk about us and what we can control--ourselves. I have found from the few times I liked-liked a guy that I sometimes--ok, ... most times--expect things I have no business expecting. Period. I know I'm not the only one guilty of this because I have had enough friends and associates--male and female--express the same thing. They just didn't know it. *lol* So I encourage us to be self-accountable. I find people tend to make themselves victims by placing blame on the other for hurting them--not meeting their expectations. Truth is we should be accountable for our own disappointments because the other has less control (especially at the "I like him/her" stage of the relationship) of what information (actions or lack thereof) we process or, most important, how we compute it in our self-made equations. "He's been asking about my day for 28 days, he should have asked me on a date by now." "She's been laughing at my jokes every time our friends get together, why isn't she accepting my advances?" We tend to dismiss them with ill thoughts when they don't do things we expect them to do in the time frame we expect them to take place. And it really is unfair. (And yes, yes, yes, of course s/he is a 'jerk' for misleading you and of course you can be emotionally affected by your disappointments, but) I would encourage you to put your emotions on the shelf and access the circumstance fairly. Did they mislead you or did you mislead yourself? I have decided that, if someone did not vow to be whatever I expected them to be, I have no right to be mad at them for not meeting the expectation. (Of course it hurts because when you like someone--most of us like them for good reason; they're interesting, they have good energy, they're the type of person you'd like to know--you would like them to have a lasting role in your life. ...And if you're like me, a romantic, which means that my imagination tends to guide me to thoughts of future tense, it can feel like a dream has been put to death... again, but the reality is they aren't responsible for my dreams and) They owe me nothing. Period. I chose to interact with them. I accepted their doings and sayings, applied the mathematical formula I believed to be fitting for their actions, and came to the conclusion/theory/answer that resulted in me forming an expectation.
Sometimes, ladies and gentlemen, people are no more than what they are presenting to you--a guy that asks about your day, a girl that finds your jokes funny. And that's it. Not the guy that asks about your day and will one day become your future kids' father. Not the girl that finds your jokes funny and will one day sit on the porch swing with you in old age. It's possible, but that's not the case today. So be careful looking so far ahead that your disappointment that things aren't going as expected destroys your chance of having what you didn't expect--a new friend or a new supporter of your dreams. (Yeah, I know, that's not what you want. I get it. But you also don't want to be with someone who doesn't want to be with you romantically either. You're not a charity case.) See, sometimes people are only guaranteeing you the here and now (today). And the future (tomorrow... yeah, literally tomorrow) is still up for consideration.
And sometimes we don't give him or her a chance! We get so impatient--forgetting that relationships are best slow cooked, not nuked in a microwave--and our expectations get the best of us. Life, like us, is complex and sometimes life, which consists of time and priorities doesn't allow us to do what we want to do (or at least not the way we prefer to do it). It's likely that s/he has considered you for the future--they are interested in you and they find you funny--but you are not a priority worthy of their time... right now. I think the BEST thing an old friend told me once was "Tell me what you know, not what you think" because there have been times that I could have destroyed what is if I had acted upon the conclusions of what I thought was. We often form conclusions based upon what we feel (think) and not facts (know). With new relationships, especially, we have to remove our emotions and make conclusions of people's character (and/or actions) based upon facts. We feel like we're being ignored or we've been forgotten, but the fact is that we haven't heard from him or her in a while. The fact is we don't know why we haven't heard from them in a while. Maybe they are swamped with work and/or school, maybe they are on vacation, maybe they lost their phone, maybe they are on a mental/spiritual hiatus, maybe they are a clown in the circus, maybe they don't like you. The point is you don't know, so until that maybe turns into a definite yes or no, don't conclude the worst. Time will tell. Trust me. But if you count them out before time gives you the final answer, you'll never know what could've, should've, or would've been. Only time will let you know whether you are 'smelling the coffee' or 'jumping to conclusions'.
I remember when I graduated from my alma mater, it just seemed as if none of my best friends... were my friends. They weren't answering phones call, returning phone calls or any form of communication and I started to feel discarded. I started to have a pity party and think "Wow. I thought they were my friends. I guess not." But then my ability to think about more than one thing at once kicked in and I was also thinking "Ok, be rational. Everyone is embarking on a new chapter in their lives. They might just be busy. All I know is that they aren't communicating with me, but I don't know why. I need to check my ego; the world does not revolve around me and I can't possibly expect my friends, who are starting new careers and/or grad school all while juggling boyfriends/husbands (and surely other things), to make me a top priority right now." ...Let's just say that I found with time that my rational self was right and my emotional self was ALL wrong. If I had acted on my former thoughts, I could have burnt bridges. Now, if you're saying to yourself "Well, I don't know what to think. I can't tell if s/he is playin' with my emotions or not", I say, "Ask him/her." The truth of the matter is this, if someone REALLY doesn't want to be bothered with you, they won't be bothered, they won't take time to answer your question. Remember, people do what they want to do. And eventually they will. Now, please don't assume they don't want to be bothered, if they don't answer you when you expect them to. I'll also say, "In the meantime of waiting for the answer live your life." Don't wait by the phone. Don't check your email... and your Facebook Inbox ...and his or her Wall every 15 minutes to see if their Recent Activity gives you signs of life. Because with time you will find the truth and there's no sane reason to make yourself miserable, when indeed you may have been smelling the coffee and just needed time to confirm it OR you had been jumping to conclusions and needed time to confirm that you were giving yourself heartache for 'nothing'.
Being patient when seeking answers is best. I mean, time doesn't lie. That's for sure. It frees your mind from asking yourself a bunch of questions that cannnot be answered unless time passes and you look around and realize s/he never got back to you or you have heard from them. And, if the latter occurs, it would be much easier to lightheartedly inform them that you thought you would never hear from them again than it is to shamefully explain that you didn't know it was s/he calling because you deleted their phone number from your cellular, that you would like them to accept your Friend Request because you removed them from your Friends List, and that you hope they forgive you for all the poor things you said about them when you dragged their precious name in the mud to anyone who was willing (or held hostage) to listen to your woes.
Sometimes we expect people to act in a capacity that they aren't meant to fulfill, that they don't want to fulfill and it's arrogant of us to take the stance that ultimately states s/he should act in the capacity that we want them to--our lover, our best friend, whatever we desire and expect of them. "How dare they?", we ask. But the question is "How dare we conclude that someone in whom we have grown interested should have the same interest in us? And if they don't, deem something to be wrong with them (or ourselves) because they rejected us?" Reality is it's simply a case of two people wanting two different things and therefore what you desire is not what's best for you anyways. Listen, I don't care how great, beautiful, lovely he or she is, if they don't want to be more than friends (or strangers for that matter) that is their prerogative. And it's not fair to question their choice or their character. If you disagree, I'll tell you what I have had to tell myself, "Get over yourself, learn the lesson (there is one... and it most likely has everything to do with you), and move on." Rise above despair. People are not evil people, generally, who interact with others for the sole purpose of abusing them--giving them false impressions, hurting their feelings, and contributing to their mental and emotional distress. I think sometimes we meet a person, build a relationship of some sort with them, and in the meantime obtain in-/direct messages from them and come to develop a mental list of what and what not this person is capable of doing. And when they do the unexpected, which tends to disappoints us, we deem the person a 'jerk' (or worse). When in reality, they are all that they've always been--usually good--we just don't see it to be so because we have limited their goodness to our expectations.
Another good read, A Week Later, that is somewhat related. If I was a poetic storyteller, I would have said it like this--engaging, funny, short & sweet.
Posted by miss royal at 4:25 AM 0 comments
Labels: accountability, Just a Thought, peace, self-discovery
Sunday, January 31, 2010
It Takes a Village. ...Or Does It?
This morning I was sitting in my room studying and downstairs my mother and her friend were talking. ...And I kept hearing this child say, "Mommy. Mommy. Mommy." And then repeatedly call my mother's name. Well, I must say this perturbed me. Not because the child was calling for them, but because she was calling for them while they were clearly talking. I thought, "This child doesn't have any manners." But then I thought about it and realized that a child at that age only do what they are allowed to. Which further made me think of why the adults hadn't corrected the child's behavior. ...This then made me think about the bigger picture: the state of the community. Yeah, I'm serious.
The situation was reminiscent of the bigger community. Truth of the matter is there was a child downstairs who was, in my opinion, acting unmannerly, two adults--one being the parent and the other being a friend of the parent--not addressing the matter, and a young woman, me, upstairs wanting so badly to address it, but opted out because she didn't want to be out of order or offensive. This happens EVERYDAY in the community.
In a perfect world, the child would know better because the parent would have taught the child better. In a better world, if the parent had not taught the child their manners, the parent's friend would have addressed the child herself. And in a good world, I would have gone downstairs, knelt down to the girl at eye level and said, "Hey Child's Name, your mom and Ms. My Mother's Name are talking. If you want their attention, say 'excuse me' sunshine. Ok?" And smiled. ...But none of this occurred. So what type of world is this?
What type of world is this that people turn a blind eye to things that are not right? What type of world is this that people who want to address a problem hesitate to do so because they don't want to get in 'someone else's business'? What type of world is this that when a person is addressed they take offense, they're on the defensive? In my opinion, this is a world that is soon to crumble. Seriously. Sometimes I think of the world I, God-willing, will bring children into. I mean, what state will this world be in--when basic manners, basic expressions of respect for another like "Please", "Thank you", and "Excuse me" are no longer being taught or being required? What will the state of the world be in when those of the community decide to shut their eyes at everything that is out of order? Clearly, if you close your eyes, it doesn't mean the boogey man is no longer standing in front of you. And as a people, have we become so sensitive that we can't accept constructive criticism without being on the defensive? When did it become odd for the wise to correct the wrongdoing?
Trust me, I know I've heard or have even thought myself "Old people always in somebody's business!" But Lord knows, I wish there was somebody in someone's "business". (I place 'business' in quotation marks because, we are each other's business. There's nothing that happens on the other side of the fence that doesn't in some way affect my yard. Maybe not directly and maybe not today, but it will and it DOES.) If someone's getting in your business out of the spirit of love, I see nothing wrong with that. And I stand by that. But because people don't like to be held accountable--the REAL root of the matter--no one wants anyone to interject, even if that interjection is most needed for the well-being of our community.
I don't know how many times I've seen a child look like they could use a hug or a man look like he could use a smile while I was out on the town (or any form of injustice or pain) and instead of providing those things, as that small voice inside of me told me to, I kept it moving because my desire to oblige that voice within was overpowered by the fear of being looked at as weird or my actions being misunderstood. It is indeed difficult to balance the need to be your brother's keeper and to let your brother be, but we can't get to a point where our village is becoming more like a vast land of separate tents. Does that make sense? I hope so.
- My hope is that those with wisdom guide those that may not be wise.
- My hope is that those who are aware of destructive behavior--no matter how small or big--of the community, address it.
- My hope is that those addressed discern (which, honestly, requires maturity) whether the words of guidance spoken are said out of malice or love, falsehood or truth before becoming defensive or offended. (We have to be big enough to look ourselves in the mirror, ladies and gentleman. If we can't address issues within ourselves, how can we address any issue?)
- My hope is that we can find somewhere, somehow the benefit of having a village, even among this big ol' world. We can't get so advanced that we no longer recognize the sanctity of community.
It indeed takes a village to raise a child and for us all to survive. I'm not talking about mere physical survival, but the survival of the orientation of our family called the human race. Right now, in my humble opinion, we are quite incompetent and mediocre where it really matters, i.e. respect for others, the values that we pass on from generation to generation, our general mindset. Right now the lesson being taught is "be quiet, don't rebel even when it's absolutely necessary" (and it's necessary whenever it affects our well-being negatively, killing us, disabling us).
In fact, stories, such as Chicago's Derrion Albert, are a result of such destruction of a village. When the tragedy occurred I heard a lot of people place blame on a lot of people. But truth is no one every claimed accountability for their contribution to such a tragedy, whether directly or indirectly (remember that fence I mentioned above?) Many didn't and still haven't come forward out of fear--fear of the community bullies, but also the fear of being deemed a "snitch". It's a culture that is destroying our villages. Secondly, many people fail to have respect for others, so to take someone else's life is done effortlessly. And thirdly, I'm very sure that the culture (according to dictionary.com, "the quality in a person or society that arises from a concern for what is regarded as excellent") of that Chicago community has been that way for generations. The acceptance of and excuses people made for the actions of those that took Albert's life was heartbreaking to hear. (http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/category/walk-in-my-shoes/: The last video in particular affected me the most. I couldn't even be upset with the young man because he's stating the facts of his reality, that "People die daily.") But again, because people who are aware of the boogey man choose to close their eyes instead of face it, the cycle continues. And because those that have been educated by the ones who choose not to face the boogey man identifies the boogey man as a norm that should not be addressed and, furthermore, finds it offensive to address it, the boogey man keeps lurking at our expense.
We have to decide at what cost we are willing to have our village, or what's left of it, destroyed. Is the cost of being considered "nosey", "a snitch", or "weird" too high to address the issues of our community and the possible continuation of those issues once we're dead and gone from this world? I say, "No."
We can't mind our business at the expense of allowing someone to be led astray, by not guiding each other at all in fear of offending. Truth is we all need to be offended from time to time in order to get out of our comfort zone. We must stop embracing this culture of not being accountable, for not only ourselves but each other, for we should be our brother's keeper.
And, yes, it does take a village.
Posted by miss royal at 3:30 PM 2 comments
Labels: accountability, community, constructive criticism, culture, hope, love, survival





